I've been puzzling for days over Mike Huckabee's comment that Democrats are trying to make women think we need the help of the government to regulate our libidos. I'm completely lost. Since he said it in terms of birth control, I guess it must mean that if women could regulate our libidos, we wouldn't need birth control. I guess if I would have been able to regulate my libido, I would never have become pregnant accidentally.
I guess unwanted pregnancies are a function of women's unregulated libido rather than lack of birth control. Which adds up to: don't have sex unless you want to get pregnant - which would be about twice in a lifetime for most women. Not only would we women have to have tight control on our libido, that would pretty much mean a whole lot less sex for men - except and unless they paid for it or got it from women who wanted endless numbers of kids.
Well, I can't really figure this out. Was he serious? Is that really what a lot of conservative men think?
No comments:
Post a Comment